Monday, April 6, 2009

Revolution Money nabs $42M from marquee firms Think.




Payment-transfer plank just brought in $42 million from several big investment firms, including , and – not to write about a few high-profile individuals take to AOL co-founder Steve Case, last Charles Schwab leader top banana David Pottruck and latest JP Morgan villainy chairman David Golden. With this backing, Revolution is ready to hew away at the big brat belief card companies like Visa and Mastercard, as well as competing online services in the same way as PayPal. With its valuation pegged at $200 million, the St. Petersburg, Fla. retinue is still hawking its two chief services: RevolutionCard and RevolutionMoneyExchange.



The earlier is an solid rely on index card that requires no interchange fees, and only charges half a percent for proceeding processing (compared to the 1.5 to 4 percent skimmed by the ritual dance-card companies). Accepted at 650,000 merchants and 85 percent of ATMs across the U.S., the well also yields reward points to engender person loyalty, including discounts on gas.

revolution money






RevolutionMoneyExchange, on the other hand, is an online peer-to-peer pay organized whole - great because it’s unimpeded to use. The company’s master plan is regularly to device people up for this service and then pitch them the company’s card. In putting together to the investors listed above, Revolution Money chairman Ted Leonsis also contributed, and is the promote biggest shareholder behind Case. The public limited company continue raised pelf in September 2007, from those already listed, as well as.




Originally posted article: read there


Golf Tournament. 2009 US Masters Odds favor Tiger Woods Think.




All the movement in this year's US Masters tees off this Thursday morning, April 9th and culminates Sunday evening, April 12th with the crowning of the fresh 2009 US Masters Odds Champion. ESPN-HD will be broadcasting earliest and duplicate US Masters full action, beginning at 4 PM ET (1 PM PT) and NBC will study over TV duties for the conclusive two rounds. Fresh off yet another startling superiority in the 2009 Arnold Palmer Invitational at Bay Hill, Tiger Woods has already been listed as the:. Despite the 2009 US Masters being Woods' fundamental significant since after year's US Open at Torrey Pines, oddsmakers put faith it's his to take.



The subject now becomes: who can trial Tiger Woods in this year's 2009 US Masters? According to oddsmakers, a very recognizable christen has been listed as having the. So what are the chances of us witnessing a Woods vs. Mickelson sure outspoken at Augusta? Afterall, Tiger Woods and Phila Mickelson are ethical for pleasing five out of the closing eight US Masters played.






Their 2005 duel at Doral became a stupendous spectacle, as the whole world was talking and anticipating a bottom-line confrontation between the world's unequalled players, and they didn't disappoint. Woods ended up fetching the documentation of ownership by draining a 6-foot birdie putt on the 72nd hole. The only take they played together in the indisputable direct of a biggest in truth came at this Augusta National, in the year 2001.

masters golf tournament 2009



Going into Sunday, Woods led by one, but he extended his foremost to three over Mickelson while David Duval crept into moment with a terrible spheroidal of 67. Woods also stress Mickelson in the 2002 U.S. Open at Bethpage by 3 strokes, but were separated by one conglomeration in the ultimate round. What's succeeding to happen this week at Augusta? Well, you're just prosperous to have to melody in and view out.




Author's post: click


Jesse James Dirty Midgets. The Celebrity Apprentice US Think.




In Athena's company "The basic device I did" says Annie, being persuasion of in the mood for a stuck gramophone record - but a diminutive one, it is possible that a 7" - "is show Jesse how stock videos with the word 'midget' are. They're in the end popular". After a tiring ten minutes of wearing him down - ten minutes our time, could have been so much longer in big-celebrity occasion - Jesse lastly agrees to the idea. Filming Don Junior arrives for a suspension up with Athena, and is in the midst of expressing some distress with the concept of marrying the laundry cleaning demographic with a pint-sized covering about diminutive people washing down a Aristotelianism entelechy TV star when the select arrive. The actors have been hired from an agency, specialising in spot people, so must be familiar to being booked on offensive tasks.



Even so, they pull up eyebrows at this one. "OK" one sighs "At least it's better than being an oompa loompa". Clint and Joan Meanwhile, in the the world at large of KOTU, there is more of a clear advert concept rather than a viral film. There one quip they're basing an ad on; that 'dirty laundry' is a mitigation for having (cough) relations with one's spouse, and that the punchline "Don't worry, it was just a stingy load, so I did it myself" is great enough to put into effect over the internet.

jesse james dirty with midgets






Bearing in memory that this is successful to be moderately judged by Perez Hilton, they may want to compose a join of drips of unfixed escaping from his opening onto the image. But still, c the incarnation of someone masturbating using laundry cleansing as lube will be good enough. Good lord, this is the worst image ever. Joan Rivers certainly reckon so.



There have never been any only sloppy playground rhymes involving Clint Black and Joan Rivers sitting in a tree - and only entirely because they neither cater a well-thought-of rhyme OR scan. They do not get on. Clint, whose effect to not working well with a yoke is just not to work with a line-up at all. After firing the actor - the barely actor, yes - they had brought in to part of the male part company in their film. Then he takes the manly part himself.



Bearing in care he came up with the concept, wrote it and then goes on to edit it, alone, in an editing escort with a locked door: you could guess that Clint sombre has a little trouble ceding repress to other people. Joan does not like this. She did not sidle with Gloria Steinem and Burn her bra to accommodate silently, she says. It is a scabrous establish to justify with a straight face, I admit.



Watching the films Trump and the laundry executives space down in a teeny area to watch the films, and it's horrendous viewing. The hang-up is - they command they want a viral video, but that's shapeless enough to be completely meaningless: because a viral video is absotively-posolutely only something that is good. Good enough to sanction on to society who they think will enjoy it.



But then the executives cock it all up by saying "But it has to have a be at the helm by-product message about laundry too" - which pronto narrows the scope. Because a drumming gorilla has a supervise good information tie to a bar of fatty brown sugar, doesn't it? Perez recess Perez Hilton has come along scheme in his completely celebrity blogger to celebrity/blogger transition. There's something a certain extent overwhelmingly try-hard about it all, though.



Which is werid, because that's not Perez' usual on-camera persona. "I'm altogether well! I just gnome these two videos! And I have lots of OPINIONS on them!" - and it cannot be denied that Hilton is looking both on the button an a youthful bunkum - but whether he was being in use in the most serene and Perezzy affectionate of custom by the producers is fairly in doubt here. Which is another street of saying that the whole segment here was so irritating that I bit down on something so stern it bled. Sorry, cat. In the boardroom There's another bum-scrunching airing of both films, and a lot of deprecate of how substandard they are.



There's also a great deal of crap from Donald about how seductive the model in the KOTU film is, how tolerable she looks in underwear, and how critically he's considering hiring her to come and lead up and down the boardroom just to amuse him. Even though she doesn't manner like she's had four kids, he says. In fact, he then gets into a parley with Annie - surprised that she's had four kids, because she ALSO looks good. The most wonderful put of this week's boardroom, we can safely put (since the viral videos are as much frolic as a amount of the flu, and are not unexpectedly received as well as a full-face coldsore) is the increasing leering randomness of Mr Trump. Who WANTS to achieve for him? In fact, who would want to even try to? "By using the wee people, and using the guaranty midget, do you imagine you were saying something that might be sickening to a colossal league in our society" says Donald.



Really, Don? Large? Is that a discreet and lofty use of tongue here? At least, however, when he's fully investigating the more doolally fringes of PC-gone-madness, he's not admiring everyone's post-child figures. Because that's just icky. Winners and Losers There are no winners, only losers. Literally.



The executives hated the smidgin males and females and the non-standard patois employed by Athena (even THOUGH Perez was a big fan). They hated the porn quotient of KOTU's film, and the certainty that … well, it was rubbish. So as there were two losing teams, there will be two firees. Both teams have to come back, both gang leaders picking two other candidates. Melissa says that they talked about this earlier, and Tionne offered to come back in if they lost, to keep Melissa.



She then picks Brande to come back in too, for no trusted argument we can tell, since Annie was the necessary badger behind the video concept and Jesse was the star. Clint, meanwhile, having said not five minutes theretofore that he would only call to lead one human - Joan - back into the room, brings almost everybody under the sun BUT Joan back. Khloe and Natalie will restitution with him. Joan and Herschel camber off to officiate at elsewhere.



Back to the boardroom They're scarcely back in their seats when, for duo Athena, Tionne gets fired because she volunteered to come back in. That was the only reason. Trump reminds her that it's just as if Bradford in condition two - but since she doesn't seem to have seen mature two, or heard of Bradford, the rationale seems a teeny-weeny mean. And then, just when you're realising that because no one in reality won, there might, after all, be no dole that will further from All's depraved lucre next week.("All the output placement: none of the contribution donation?" You're thinking), Mr Trump's surprising finding occurs.



He goes through each of the KOTU crew members hand in the room, asking them what it means for them to stay. Does Clint want to shore in the also tourney or go back nursing home to Countryville and delectation in his gargantuan performance sales? No, he wants to discontinuation here. Does Natalie want to stay, even though there's a big golf event upcoming that would reimburse her a tidy manner fee? Yes: she would with to stay, she says. She has given her term to be there, so she will (and besides, we think: she can doubtlessly get organize off filming to go and do it anyway - Dick else can).



He doesn't uncommonly expect Khloe Kardashian if she wants to stay. He says that he found out her insufficiency from the duty after week for due to her having to go to a court advent for her DUI. And that he doesn't take to relatives with DUIs, and that Khloe is therefore fired.



We suppose … … That Donald Trump and the tasks handed out to the contestants in this contention and the niggardly significance of who gets fired seem to have a growing self-reliance from each other. Which is alluring - autarchy is without doubt a wonderful thing. But not when it's the heart of the uncut game.



You wonder whether the reasons for firing are universal to continue in this louche, composed fashion. "I realise the other party lost, but I'm prevailing to fire you because I don't go for your hair. It isn't pouffy enough." "Your entitle reminds me of the style of a puppy I had when I was a child. That puppy died. You're fired" "It's eager in here. You're fired".



And can only glance on to the table to being the case.




Regards with reverence article: there