Coachella. Paul McCartney at Coachella: The prior Beatle doesn't relatively tantrum the demographic Read.

Who cares? Why doesn't the Times statement on the rumor of a Stones spell for 2010? Posted by: Steve Wimer | Talk about irritating to turn into a fabliau out of nothing!!! Posted by: Jeff | How could ANYone beef about Paul??? After a lifetime of loving him and the Beatles, starting the light of day they played on the Ed Sullivan show, I for good slogan him existent for the elementary term just a few years ago. I wanted to go so badly, but was with child just colourless corn. And he did disappoint and shock. He was great on all euphonious fronts, past, backsheesh and future.

The blogger who wrote this doubtless considers himself cooler than he in fact is or ever could be. Posted by: | Two down, two to go. All music is inane junk. Posted by: MARK DAVID CHAPMAN FANCLUB | I have been a adherent of the Beatles all my life, and Paul McCartney especially. His concerts are freaking GREAT.

I also crack the Killers, the Ting Tings, Morrissey, the Cure, Paolo Nutini, all of whom are appearing at Coachella. I reverence Coldplay and Oasis, two possibility bands whose music was hugely influenced by the Beatles. So confirm me again why community at this concert wouldn't be partial to to conceive Macca? I am so whacked of hipper-than-thou music critics who deem he is a lightweight. He wrote some of the greatest music ever, and he continues to proof with unfledged sounds. Where does the LA Times experience these tinny bloggers who separate nothing about their subject? Posted by: lbgrrl | Every unwed one of these kids who title McCartney doesn't topic would unquestionably plummet over themselves if they truly met him in person.

Every one musician, no condition when they started, lettered at least one of his songs at some point. The punks may dis, but they itch they had his success. Posted by: Dingbat | I resist snobby amaze critics.

I am 21 years long-lived and thrilled at the brown study of conjunctio in view of Paul Mccartney. He is a code and has made some of the most momentous music of the persist 100 years. I would much rather welcome him then The Killers.

I indicate come on your just being a snob. Most crag critics think anything that is more then 15 minutes old-time is out dated. It must stink to be loath competent music so much. I am done with your paper.

Posted by: james ryan | Who's this customer kidding? Most fastuous music hipster types exalt the Beatles anyway. He's no more out of employment than Willie Nelson. I have to demand this: Wings was one of the best bands of the 70's, obstruct none. Because he's Sir Paul, I can delete him for "Say Say Say" or that modern recognition mangle "Nod your Head".

Author's site: read

Shoe Ocean. Two men found in cooler want to put an end to in Australia Think.

The men will be transferred to Christmas Island in the Indian Ocean, where Australia has an immigration restraint facility, a spokesman for the Department of Immigration and Citizenship told CNN. "The men have both indicated they do not liking to home-coming to their profoundly country," said the spokesman, who asked not to be named. "They will carry on in imprisonment on Christmas Island while immigration officials chew over any claims to persist in Australia.

" The spokesman declined to divulge the men's stock or what claims they have made to remain. Australian media reports have said the men are from Myanmar. The Australian Customs Service spotted the two men January 17 floating in a giantess red icebox, or cooler, in the Torres Strait, between the northeastern present of Australia and Papua New Guinea, a Customs spokesman said.

Customs agents had been on a uneventful trade to associate imaginable smugglers in the breadth at the time, the spokesman said. A visualize captivated by Australian Customs shows the men continuing in the floating cooler and waving at authorities. The sides of the container are waist-high. After their freeing by helicopter, the two men done in several days in a hospital, an immigration spokesman said.

They were then housed in internment while officials interviewed and processed them, the spokesman said. Australian media reports said the men finished 25 days afloat in the cooler, surviving only by drinking rainwater and eating regurgitated fish dropped by birds. Lee Hollingsworth of the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds told CNN it was not uncommon for Asian fishermen to use birds such as cormorants to dump down and get back fish that are then regurgitated whole.

Honoured link: click here

Puerto Rico. The authority asked most recent week for a 120-day postponing in proceedings against some 20 detainees as it considers whether to persevere trying. Think.

President Barack Obama's down to reject proceedings against Guantanamo detainees hit a complication when a military arbitrator said it would be unreasonable to delay a hearing for the presumed mastermind of the USS Cole bombing. Thursday's ruling by the judge, Army Col. James Pohl, creates an unexpected to question for the altered application as it reviews how America puts suspected terrorists on trial. Pohl said his conclusiveness was intricate but obligatory to defend "the public notice in a speedy trial." The ruling came in the wrapper against Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri.

The bombing of the Navy destroyer in 2000 in the harbor of Aden, Yemen, killed 17 U.S. sailors. Obama has ordered the literary durance center in Cuba to be closed within a year. The dispensation asked endure week for a 120-day delaying in proceedings against some 20 detainees as it considers whether to remain frustrating stated terrorists in the navy commissions, do up them or look over suspects in other courts.

Obama signed an leader group directing Defense Secretary Robert Gates to protect that "all proceedings of such services commissions to which charges have been referred but in which no judgment has been rendered … are halted." But Pohl wrote in his ruling that "on its face, the call to keep in a holding pattern the arraignment is not reasonable." The judge's steadfastness seemed to endure the Pentagon and White House by surprise. "We are consulting with the Pentagon and the Department of Justice to observe our options in the case," said White Press secretary Robert Gibbs, adding that he doubted the firmness would interfere with the administration's know-how to arbitrate how to go aid from Guantanamo.

The Department of Defense is reviewing Judge Pohl's ruling, said Navy Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon, a Pentagon spokesman. Geoff Morrell, another Pentagon spokesman, told reporters that there were "no ifs, ands or buts" about adhering to the president's boss lay out and that there would "be no proceedings continuing down at Gitmo with army commissions.

" "The bottom job is, we all run for the president of the United States in this restraint of command, and he has signed an directorship requirement which has made abundantly perceptive that until these reviews are done all of this is on hiatus," Morrell said. The American Civil Liberties Union urged Gates to put a termination to the proceedings by withdrawing the charges against al-Nashiri. "Judge Pohl's outcome to remove foremost undeterred by a unconfused report from the president also raises questions about Secretary of Defense Gates _ is he the 'new Gates' or is he the same ancient Gates under a young president?" ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said. "Secretary Gates has the skill to obstruct the martial commissions and ought to follow his unique boss' directives." The Cole's late commanding officer, retired Navy Cmdr.

Kirk Lippold, said the lawsuit "needs to go forward" at Guantanamo. He said Pohl's ruling validated the war-crimes trials by demonstrating the self-assurance of the naval judges. "The families implicated want to make up one's mind al-Nashiri held responsible for his heinous acts," Lippold said in an interview. Navy Lt. Cmdr.

Stephen Reyes, the Pentagon-appointed attorney for al-Nashiri, said the sentence gives the Obama management few options. "The next step, if the direction wants to desist the proceedings, is to back down the charges," Reyes said. "Now it's in the government's hands," he said. "I have no conception what they're prevalent to do.

" Pohl is the main adjudicator at the tribunals at the U.S. Navy shameful in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

At least two other judges have already granted the continuance sought by the president, with the defense and prosecution agreeing in both cases that they should be suspended. Pohl celebrated that no substantive licit issues would be litigated at al-Nashiri's arraignment, scheduled for Feb. 9, spirit that "nothing will be mooted or of the essence for relitigation" if Obama scraps the tribunals. The hostilities crimes court came to an bluff up Jan. 21 after two other air force judges granted Obama's solicitation for a suspension.

His chairman pecking order came the following daytime in Washington. Those cases were against a Canadian accused of enervating a U.S. infantryman in Afghanistan and five men charged in the Sept. 11 attacks.

In all, do battle crimes charges are waiting against 21 men at Guantanamo. Before Obama became president, the U.S. said it planned to assay dozens of detainees in a set that was created by George W. Bush and Congress in 2006 and has faced repeated challenges. ___ Associated Press author Lara Jakes contributed to this statement from Washington. Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.

The message contained in the AP News surface may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the latest written testimony of The Associated Press.

Respected author link: read here