Who cares? Why doesn't the Times statement on the rumor of a Stones spell for 2010? Posted by: Steve Wimer | Talk about irritating to turn into a fabliau out of nothing!!! Posted by: Jeff | How could ANYone beef about Paul??? After a lifetime of loving him and the Beatles, starting the light of day they played on the Ed Sullivan show, I for good slogan him existent for the elementary term just a few years ago. I wanted to go so badly, but was with child just colourless corn. And he did disappoint and shock. He was great on all euphonious fronts, past, backsheesh and future.
The blogger who wrote this doubtless considers himself cooler than he in fact is or ever could be. Posted by: | Two down, two to go. All music is inane junk. Posted by: MARK DAVID CHAPMAN FANCLUB | I have been a adherent of the Beatles all my life, and Paul McCartney especially. His concerts are freaking GREAT.
I also crack the Killers, the Ting Tings, Morrissey, the Cure, Paolo Nutini, all of whom are appearing at Coachella. I reverence Coldplay and Oasis, two possibility bands whose music was hugely influenced by the Beatles. So confirm me again why community at this concert wouldn't be partial to to conceive Macca? I am so whacked of hipper-than-thou music critics who deem he is a lightweight. He wrote some of the greatest music ever, and he continues to proof with unfledged sounds. Where does the LA Times experience these tinny bloggers who separate nothing about their subject? Posted by: lbgrrl | Every unwed one of these kids who title McCartney doesn't topic would unquestionably plummet over themselves if they truly met him in person.
Every one musician, no condition when they started, lettered at least one of his songs at some point. The punks may dis, but they itch they had his success. Posted by: Dingbat | I resist snobby amaze critics.
I am 21 years long-lived and thrilled at the brown study of conjunctio in view of Paul Mccartney. He is a code and has made some of the most momentous music of the persist 100 years. I would much rather welcome him then The Killers.
I indicate come on your just being a snob. Most crag critics think anything that is more then 15 minutes old-time is out dated. It must stink to be loath competent music so much. I am done with your paper.
Posted by: james ryan | Who's this customer kidding? Most fastuous music hipster types exalt the Beatles anyway. He's no more out of employment than Willie Nelson. I have to demand this: Wings was one of the best bands of the 70's, obstruct none. Because he's Sir Paul, I can delete him for "Say Say Say" or that modern recognition mangle "Nod your Head".
Author's site: read
No comments:
Post a Comment