[] @ reesie kitty: I never implied media has been acting duly through all of this, but again, it's Chris Brown's actions that should be receiving the distinction immediately now. And well, duh! Gossip columns have never been known to set precedents for decency and principled practices, why watch them to now? As for Rihanna being rank because she is not doing the amend act in this situation, again, victims of household scold deal with the same issues whether they happen to be distinguished or not. It is not as lenient as saying, 'well, every Tom expects this of me so I will do it.' She is in a relation that has skewed her be under the impression that of what is in the pink and what is a indubitably loving relationship.
To have her to deed in a sure means because she has fans who will hold her liable is a shoddy way of looking at all of this. Why state more demands on this woman? Why does she be indebted to anyone anything? Because she's famous? That's not a correct enough reason. If anything, her active back to Chris Brown could get up lines of bull session amongst teens and their parents about what is agreeable and unacceptable in a relationship, and to air at the factors that play into why hurt women remain in relationships with their partners.
Parents can use this keynote to talk about what happens when you get sucked into an damaging relationship, and why it's so momentous to recognize red flags so it's plausible to get out before things escalate to any more extent. @Myst: Abused women do not miss "pity" as you put it. No more than they necessity consumers calling them stupid. You voice "If she doesn't trouble about her career then by all means do what you want to do but that doesn't stinting that we should just sit back and accept it and we shouldn't.
" But again, this is not about you or her fans or anyone else. It's about her. She has to seductiveness herself out of this, but she needs unconditional finances and help. Why is the the missis being held responsible and treated twin she owes anyone anything? She is not anyone's property. It seems as if just such as Chris Brown feels he has the expert to outrage her person with violence, the clear feels they have the authority to assign demands on her and tell what she should do. She is not anyone's property.
It boggles my aptitude that hoi polloi seem to be just as angry with her as with Chris Brown, if not more so. This complete posture of blaming the victim just deflects from the truthful issue here, which is that home abuse should not occur EVER.
No comments:
Post a Comment